AN APPEAL FOR SUPPORT
BOOKS FOR YOU TO READ AND DOWNLOAD
REFERENCE MATERIAL
BACK ISSUES
Copyright © 2004 |
AN ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH STUDENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
|
Year |
Total Candidates enrolled |
Total number of Passes according to Grades |
||||||||||||
|
|
A1 |
A2 |
A3 |
C4 |
C5 |
C6 |
P7 |
P8 |
F9 |
||||
1992 |
357722 |
38 |
192 |
2939 |
746 |
7075 |
27656 |
46129 |
60349 |
217593 |
||||
96.00 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.9 |
7.6 |
12.6 |
16.5 |
59.3 |
|||||
1993 |
496658 |
125 |
584 |
6635 |
6916 |
11599 |
40317 |
66076 |
82644 |
285028 |
||||
99.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
2.3 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
16.6 |
57.4 |
|||||
1994 |
524294 |
38 |
266 |
4936 |
7081 |
11047 |
50789 |
70086 |
9814 |
290236 |
||||
96.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
9.7 |
13.4 |
17.1 |
55.3 |
Source: West African Examinations council, Ogba-Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.
Note:
A1 - A3 = Distinction
C4 - C6 = Credit
P7 - P8 = Pass
F9 = Fail
From the table above, over 50% of the students who sat for English Language examination for three consecutive years failed English Language.
Table 2: WAEC Enrolment and Performance in five Nigerian States
SSCE MAY/JUNE WAEC EXAMINATION (2001) |
|||||||||
STATE ENROLMENT |
TOTAL NO. ENROLLED |
TOTAL NO. ABSENT |
ACTUAL NO. WHO DID THE EXAM |
NO. WHO HAD CREDITS A1 – C6 |
% CREDITS |
NO. WHO HAD PASSES P7 – P8 |
% PASSES |
NO. WHO FAILED F9 |
% FAILURES |
ABUJA |
4872 |
68 |
4804 |
1387 |
28.9 |
1370 |
28.50 |
2047 |
42.6 |
DELTA |
39839 |
695 |
39144 |
9989 |
25.52 |
13726 |
35.07 |
15429 |
39.4 |
EDO |
35383 |
573 |
34810 |
17088 |
49.01 |
11302 |
32.50 |
6420 |
18.4 |
KADUNA |
27933 |
455 |
27478 |
5075 |
18.5 |
8504 |
31.00 |
13899 |
50.6 |
LAGOS |
147989 |
1882 |
146107 |
54633 |
37.4 |
42937 |
20.40 |
48537 |
33.2 |
Source - The West African examinations Council, Ogba-Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
Out of a total number of 252,343 students who sat for the English Language 2001 May/June Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination, about 35% of the candidates had credits. Thirty four percent (34%) failed woefully and 33.1% had passes.
The situation of general poor performance in English Language spreads through all the levels of Nigeria's educational ladder - primary, secondary and the post secondary institutions.
The awareness about the poor performance of Nigerian students in English Language has been on since the early 1960s. As early as this time, attempts aimed at addressing issues in English language learning and instruction was made. For example, various commissions and reports such as the Grieve report (1964) and Banjo's commission (1977) were all attempts made by the government to find out how best to improve the teaching of English Language.
Banjo (1977) and Wring (1993) spelt out four important skills for measuring proficiency in English Language. They included reading, speaking, comprehension and the ability to express oneself clearly both in speech and in writing.
This trend of general poor performance in English Language is not peculiar to Nigerian students and schools. It is a worldwide problem existing even in developed countries like America. For example, Graves (1977) complained about the poor state of English Language in American schools. Harwood (1980) in acknowledging the problem in English went further to explain that the English situation in American schools was a gloomy one. The three critics of the American English situation complained about poor mastery of skills in English Language.
With the performance of students in English Language declining steadily in the Senior Secondary Schools in Nigeria, teachers, parents, curriculum experts and evaluators are worried. Against this backdrop, this study was set up to assess factors associated with students' poor performance in SSCE English Language in Nigeria. Methodology
The study utilized survey research design. Six hundred English Language teachers at the Senior Secondary School were randomly drawn from the six Geo-political zones in Nigeria namely south-west, south-east, south-south, north-west, north-east and north-central. The questionnaire which sort responses on factors associated with students' poor performance in SSCE English Language was the major instrument used for data collection. Data collected from the 600 English Language teachers were analyzed using mean score. All items with a mean rating of 3.00 and above were regarded as factors associated with poor performance in SSCE English Language, while items with mean ratings ranging from 1.00 - 2.99 were not regarded as factors associated with poor performance in SSCE English Language.
Results
Table 3: Factors Associated with Students poor Performance in SSCE English Language
S/N |
Factors |
N |
- x
|
Remarks |
1 |
Poorly Trained English Language Teachers |
600 |
4.15 |
Agree |
2. |
Lack of infrastructural facilities |
600 |
3.94 |
Agree |
3. |
Teachers’ attitude towards innovation |
600 |
3.88 |
Agree |
4. |
The traditional content/knowledge oriented curriculum |
600 |
3.62 |
Agree |
5. |
General Students’ apathy in English language |
600 |
3.08 |
Agree |
6. |
Poor instructional delivery |
600 |
4.06 |
Agree |
Results in the above table show that all the items were regarded by English Language teachers as factors associated with students' poor performance in the subject. Poorly trained English Language teachers had the highest mean rating of 4.15. This is followed by poor instructional delivery with a mean rating of 4.06. Others are lack of infrastructural Facilities, Teachers' attitude towards innovation, the traditional content/knowledge oriented curriculum and general students' apathy in English Language with mean ratings of 3.94, 3.88, 3.62 and 3.08 respectively.
Discussion
Findings of the study have pointed out that poorly trained English Language teacher and poor instructional delivery are most critical factors associated with students' poor performance in SSCE English Language. The awful poor performance in SSCE English Language has been a source concern to all stake holders in Education in Nigeria. This finding agree with the findings of Dabalen et al (2000) who in their World Bank report scored Nigerian graduates low in English Language. They stated that the 22% unemployment rate in the metropolitan areas in Nigeria is as a result of poor quality of the graduates, particularly in the communication skills. According to them, these graduates exhibit "poor abilities in the oral and written expression in English Language. The graduates are also inadequately prepared in English Language". Therefore, there is need for a serious concern as these poorly trained teachers are employed to teach and prepare secondary school students for the School Certificate Examination in English Language. Their poor training background also has serious implication for instructional delivery. What do you expect of the students' performance in English Language? your guess is as good as mine. Of course a woeful performance.
Lack of infrastructural facilities was also found to be associated with students' poor performance in SSCE English Language. Many of the students come from technologically advanced homes where all sorts of modern gadgets such as radios, television sets, films videos, satellites, etc exist. These same students find themselves in boring and rowdy traditional classrooms, which hardly have any facilities. The classroom are usually poorly equipped and in most cases dilapidated. It is not surprising, therefore, that these students perform poorly.
Teachers' attitude towards innovation has also been criticized. This is because they have failed to take into account, the dynamic nature of English Language Curriculum. One must also point to the fact that teachers have also continued to bore students with definition and drills in grammar, vocabulary and speech work. The traditional content/knowledge oriented curriculum is still very much practiced by them. These teachers have also clung fast to the old fashioned ways and have refused to embrace the new trend of the total curriculum experience of the modern teacher. Pring (1976) and Onwuka (1985) had criticized the content/knowledge - oriented curriculum like the one practiced by the teachers of English Language. Such a curriculum does not go beyond merely imparting knowledge to the students. Trifonovitch (1981) had also explained that students are usually placed in a disadvantageous position when they learn a second language. To crown it all, the general students' apathy in English Language may be occasioned and worsened by the poorly trained teachers in whose care they are entrusted in the classroom. The unchallenging classroom and teachers' poor attitude towards innovation in the instructional delivery process also contribute to the general students' apathy in the subject, and consequently poor performance in school certificate Examination in English Language.
Conclusion and Recommendations
The study has examined the factors associated with students' poor performance in SSCE English Language in Nigerian senior secondary Schools. The results of the study showed that all the respondents agreed that poorly trained English Language teachers, poor instructional delivery, lack of infrastructural facilities, teachers' attitude towards innovation, the traditional content/knowledge oriented curriculum and the general students' apathy in English Language were factors associated with students' poor performance in English language. In order to enhance students' performance in SSCE English Language, the following recommendations are hereby proposed:
REFERENCES
Banjo, A (1977) "The Goals of Language Education in Nigeria", Bamgbose, (ed) Language in Education in Nigeria (1) 16.
Dabalen, A. Oni, B and Adekola, O. (2000) Labour Market Prospects for University Graduates in Nigeria. (World Bank report). Nigeria university system innovation project.
Graves, R. (1977) In Search of Informing Principles for the Discipline of English focus: Teaching English Language Art (4) 1
Grieve, D. (1964) Report of An inquiry into English Language Examination. Lagos: African University Press Ltd.
Harwood, J. (1980) English for Every one. The teaching of English Social mobility and the ideology of merit. The English Journal 69 (4) 31.
National Policy on Education (1981). Revised, Federal Ministry of Education, Lagos.
National Policy on Education (1988). Revised, Federal Ministry of Education, Lagos.
Onwuka, I. (1985) Curriculum Development for Africa. Lagos: Academy Press.
Pring, R. (1976) Knowledge and Schooling. London: Open Books Publishing Ltd.
Trifonovitch, G. (1981) "English as an international Language. An Attitudinal Approach" Smith, L. (ed). English for cross cultural communication. Hong Kong: Macmillan Press Ltd.
The West African Examinations Council (2001) Chief Examiners' Report.
Wring, C (1993). The Effective Teaching of Modern Languages. London: Longman Publication Co.
CLICK HERE FOR PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION.
GLOBALIZATION AND CULTURAL TERRITORIES | THE ROLE OF VISION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING
- in Children with Moderate to Severe Disabilities | EARLY GANDHI AND THE LANGUAGE POLICY - OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | AN ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH STUDENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
IN SENIOR SCHOOL CERTIFICATE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN NIGERIA ... | ENGLISH PUN AND ITS CLASSIFICATION |A COMPREHENSIVE
STUDY ON THE FORMATION OF COMPOUND VERBS IN TAMIL |LANGUAGE NEWS THIS MONTH - SINDH IN THE NATIONAL ANTHEM, FEDERAL POLITY, LINGUISTIC ISLANDS, ETC. |HOME PAGE | CONTACT EDITOR
Send your articles
as an attachment
to your e-mail to
thirumalai@bethfel.org.