LANGUAGE IN INDIA

Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow

Volume 11 : 1 January 2011
ISSN 1930-2940

Managing Editor: M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D.
Editors: B. Mallikarjun, Ph.D.
         Sam Mohanlal, Ph.D.
         B. A. Sharada, Ph.D.
         A. R. Fatihi, Ph.D.
         Lakhan Gusain, Ph.D.
         K. Karunakaran, Ph.D.
         Jennifer Marie Bayer, Ph.D.
         S. M. Ravichandran, Ph.D.
         G. Baskaran, Ph.D.

HOME PAGE


AN APPEAL FOR SUPPORT

  • We seek your support to meet the expenses relating to the formatting of articles and books, maintaining and running the journal through hosting, correrspondences, etc.Please write to the Editor in his e-mail address languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com to find out how you can support this journal. Thank you. Thirumalai, Editor.


BOOKS FOR YOU TO READ AND DOWNLOAD FREE!


REFERENCE MATERIAL

BACK ISSUES


  • E-mail your articles and book-length reports in Microsoft Word to languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com.
  • Contributors from South Asia may e-mail their articles to
    B. Mallikarjun,
    Central Institute of Indian Languages,
    Manasagangotri,
    Mysore 570006, India
    mallikarjun@ciil.stpmy.soft.net.
  • PLEASE READ THE GUIDELINES GIVEN IN HOME PAGE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE LIST OF CONTENTS.
  • Your articles and booklength reports should be written following the APA, MLA, LSA, or IJDL Stylesheet.
  • The Editorial Board has the right to accept, reject, or suggest modifications to the articles submitted for publication, and to make suitable stylistic adjustments. High quality, academic integrity, ethics and morals are expected from the authors and discussants.

Copyright © 2010
M. S. Thirumalai


 
Web www.languageinindia.com

Analysis and Categorization of the Most Prevalent Errors of
Intermediate and Elementary Iranian EFL Learners in Writing in Iran

Gholam Reza Zarei, Ph.D. (Applied Linguistics)
Sara Mansoori, M.A. in TEFL


Abstract

Nowadays English is used as a lingua franca for international relationships. Committing errors in using it may become a hindrance to effective communication. Therefore, knowing about the kinds of errors which are commonly committed by the language users, specially the non-native users of this language, seems essential.

This paper presents an analysis and categorization of the most dominant errors of intermediate and elementary Iranian EFL learners in writing.

The specific research areas of interest are: (1) to which category the most dominant errors are attributable; (2) whether the level of language proficiency makes any differentiation in the category to which the most dominant errors are attributable; and (3) to what extent the adopted model (Keshavarz, 1999) is suitable for the categorization and analysis of the errors.

An Oxford placement test was administered to107 female subjects, majoring in TOEFL in the fifth term of Najafabad Azad University to detect the participants' proficiency level. Then, 30 elementary and 30 intermediate (based on Oxford scale) subjects were selected randomly from among them. Next, they were asked to write an essay in 200 to 250 words. After that, the essays were analyzed and the errors were determined and categorized based on the adopted model.

The results indicate that:

1. The most dominant errors belong to the syntactico-morphological category.
2. The level of the proficiency makes no difference in the category to which the most common errors belong. 3. The adopted model (Keshavarz, 1999), revised a little at the end, is approximately applicable for analyzing and categorizing the errors.

Keywords: error analysis, error categorization, proficiency, intermediate and elementary groups, writing.

Introduction

The views toward errors of language learners were once greatly affected by the ideas of structuralism and behaviorism. They considered errors as signs of not having adequately acquired a linguistic system. These views asked that language teachers take greater care to help learners avoid errors in their language production. They suggested contrastive analysis to make distinctions between the learners' first and second language to predict errors and help the teacher and students avoid them.

A Turning Point

Pit Corder, an important researcher in the field of Error Analysis, changed the views toward error analysis and provided it with new directions. He disagreed with the views of structuralists and behaviorists considering the errors as blemishes that needed to be eliminated. He asserted that errors are important in and of themselves (Corder, 1967). He claimed that, for learners themselves, errors are unavoidable and mandatory because making errors can be regarded as a device the learner uses to learn. He defined error analysis as a type of linguistic analysis concentrating on the errors learners make in the process of language learning and comparing the errors made in the Target Language (TL) with that TL itself. Corder (1974) believed that systematically analyzing errors made by language learners makes it possible to determine areas that need reinforcement in teaching.


This is only the beginning part of the article. PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ THE ARTICLE IN PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION.


Love and Language - A Socio-rhetorical Analysis of Love Texts on a Ghanaian Radio Network | Cross-Cultural Conflict in Bharati Mukherjee's The Tiger's Daughter | A Comparative Study of the Study Habits of the Students of The Islamia University of Bahawalpur in Pakistan | Analysis and Categorization of the Most Prevalent Errors of Intermediate and Elementary Iranian EFL Learners in Writing in Iran | Phonological Adaptation of English Loan Words in Pahari | A Study of Sexual Health Problems among Male Migrants in Tamilnadu, India | Arun Joshi and Eco Consciousness - A Study of The Strange Case of Billy Biswas | Code-Mixing as a Communicative Strategy among the University Level Students in Pakistan | Oatesian World of Violence and Female Victimization - An Autopsy | Importance of Practicum in Teacher Training Programme - A Need of the Hour | Mentoring Teachers to Motivate Students | Exploring the Preferences of Aesthetic Needs of Secondary School Students in Faisalabad in Pakistan | Affinity and Alienation - The Predicament of the Internal Migrant in Anjum Hasan's Neti Neti | Effect of Inquiry Lab Teaching Method on the Development of Scientific Skills Through the Teaching of Biology in Pakistan | Rate of Speech in Punjabi Speakers | A Study of Orthographic Features of Instant Messaging in Pakistan - An Empirical Study | The Call for Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) at the Undergraduate Level with Special Reference to Andhra Pradesh | Case and Case-like Postposition in Surjapuri | Rabindranath Tagore's Views on Education | A PRINT VERSION OF ALL THE PAPERS OF JANUARY, 2011 ISSUE IN BOOK FORMAT.
This document is better viewed if you open it online and then save it in your computer. After saving it in your computer, you can easily read all the pages from the saved document.
| HOME PAGE | CONTACT EDITOR languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com


Gholam Reza Zarei, Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics
English Language Center
Isfahan University of Technology
Isfahan, 84156-83111
Iran
zareigr@hotmail.com

Sara Mansoori, M.A. in TEFL
Department of Teaching English
Islamic Najafabad Azad University
Najafabad
Iran
s-mansoori@iaun.ac.ir

 
Web www.languageinindia.com
  • Send your articles
    as an attachment
    to your e-mail to
    languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com.
  • Please ensure that your name, academic degrees, institutional affiliation and institutional address, and your e-mail address are all given in the first page of your article. Also include a declaration that your article or work submitted for publication in LANGUAGE IN INDIA is an original work by you and that you have duly acknolwedged the work or works of others you either cited or used in writing your articles, etc. Remember that by maintaining academic integrity we not only do the right thing but also help the growth, development and recognition of Indian scholarship.