LANGUAGE IN INDIA

Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow

Volume 21:7 July 2021
ISSN 1930-2940

Editors:
         Sam Mohanlal, Ph.D.
         B. Mallikarjun, Ph.D.
         A. R. Fatihi, Ph.D.
         G. Baskaran, Ph.D.
         T. Deivasigamani, Ph.D.
         Pammi Pavan Kumar, Ph.D.
         Soibam Rebika Devi, M.Sc., Ph.D.

Managing Editor & Publisher: M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D.

Celebrate India!
Unity in Diversity!!

HOME PAGE

Click Here for Back Issues of Language in India - From 2001




BOOKS FOR YOU TO READ AND DOWNLOAD FREE!


REFERENCE MATERIALS

BACK ISSUES


  • E-mail your articles and book-length reports in Microsoft Word to languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com.
  • PLEASE READ THE GUIDELINES GIVEN IN HOME PAGE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE LIST OF CONTENTS.
  • Your articles and book-length reports should be written following the APA, MLA, LSA, or IJDL Stylesheet.
  • The Editorial Board has the right to accept, reject, or suggest modifications to the articles submitted for publication, and to make suitable stylistic adjustments. High quality, academic integrity, ethics and morals are expected from the authors and discussants.

Copyright © 2021
M. S. Thirumalai

Publisher: M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D.
11249 Oregon Circle
Bloomington, MN 55438
USA


Custom Search

A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Educational Advertisement for
Two Leading Universities Inside and Outside China:
An Appraisal Theory Perspective

Cong Li, M.A. ELT


Abstract

This study is focusing on the persuasion process of two universities educational advertisements for multimodal appraisal resources. There are 3418 words for verbal corpus and 31 minutes for non-verbal corpus in total. The mixed methods were adopted to four objectives. 1) To identify the different verbal resources used in A and B university educational advertisement to construct meaning. 2) To identify the different non-verbal resources used in A and B university educational advertisements to construct meaning.3) To explore how persuasion is realized in A and B university educational advertisements. 4) To explore differences between A and B university educational advertisements’ realization of persuasive devices.

The findings indicated that ATTITUDE resources were most effective way to affects the audience with 41.8% and 73.6% for verbal and non-verbal. Different appraisal elements affected the listener or audience’s opinions by individual comments, questions, quotes, eye contact, body position or social distance. B university out of China involved many universities’ environment, construction or students’ life and learning sense had more emotional texts or images to persuade the audience compared A university.

Keywords: Appraisal Resources, Persuasion, Multimodal Discourse, Educational Advertisement

Introduction

With the great development of network media and electronic technology, educational advertisement (EA) shows all sorts of types and characteristics of the university and considers one of the most effective means to promote the university which combines images, music, lexical, etc., as typical multimodal discourses that the information can be expressed in various ways. The meaning is communicated through images as well as language usages (Hodge & Kress, 1988; Kress & Leeuwen, 1996; Kress, 2010). This visualization is considered visual communication and provides a better understanding of language (Hart, 2016). As a cultural product, EA combines all aspects of the colleges and universities which is closely related to image shaping, cultural building, publicity improving and an excellent way to attract students. Critical discourse analysis CDA) as a systematic approach that connects language, power and ideology which are hidden from people (Fairclough, 1989). CDA is a good way to research how power relations were exercised and negotiated through language and semiotic resources and brings social science and linguistics together that will be able to set up a dialogue between producer and viewer (Chouliarak & Fairclough, 1999, p.6).

The purpose of EA is to persuade viewers to accept their ideas and come to that university. Thus, EA content analysis is focusing on how the university expresses its attitude, evaluations, feelings, judgments and impresses the audience in a short period. Appraisal theory provides a theoretical framework to understand implied meanings using the three main systems attitude, engagement, and graduation (Foley, 2011; Martin &White, 2005). university tends to force or focus on the texts. This research analyzes how those semiotic elements are used to express attitudes, evaluations, feelings, judgments of others and appreciation of entities, and finally aligns viewers with ‘community of feeling’. Then it is easy to find how EA producer appropriately persuades the audience to attend this university and the features of those successful EA.


This is only the beginning part of the article. PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE IN PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION.


Cong Li, M.A. ELT
Department of English, Graduate School of Human Sciences
Assumption University, Thailand
Echolee94@163.com

Custom Search


  • Click Here to Go to Creative Writing Section

  • Send your articles
    as an attachment
    to your e-mail to
    languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com.
  • Please ensure that your name, academic degrees, institutional affiliation and institutional address, and your e-mail address are all given in the first page of your article. Also include a declaration that your article or work submitted for publication in LANGUAGE IN INDIA is an original work by you and that you have duly acknowledged the work or works of others you used in writing your articles, etc. Remember that by maintaining academic integrity we not only do the right thing but also help the growth, development and recognition of Indian/South Asian scholarship.